Thus the detection by microscopy, of a PB-1 situated immediately under the zona pellucida, indicates that maturational division (meiosis) has been completed. However, it does NOT confirm that chromosome segregation has take place evenly, i.e. that precisely 23 chromosomes remain in the egg nucleus (i.e. that the egg is "euploid"). The presence in the MII egg of one or more chromosomes above or below 23 in number, is referred to as "aneuploidy", a condition that almost always inevitably in failed embryo development, failed implantation, miscarriage or a chromosomal birth defect such as Down's syndrome.
As it turns out, even in younger women a half to one two thirds of MII eggs are aneuploid and this incidence increases rapidly with advancement in age beyond 35 years.
It follows therefore that the absence of a PB-1 on microscopic evaluation (i.e. an MI egg) clearly indicates that the egg had not completed meiosis, and thus "is aneuploid" and “incompetent” (i.e. is incapable of propagating a viable, healthy embryo. On the other hand, the detection of a PB-1 under the zona pellucida (an MII egg) while confirming that meiosis has been completed, offers no assurance that the egg is in fact "euploid" and thus is potentially "competent". Quite to the contrary...most MII eggs are in fact "aneuploid" and thus totally 'incompetent".
It is by and large the chromosomal integrity of the egg, rather than the sperm that determines embryo “competency”. Thus egg “competency" is an essential prerequisite for the propagation of a viable embryo and a healthy baby.
Another interesting fact is that in more than 90% of cases, an embryo that fails to reach the blastocyst stage (>100 cells), will be aneuploid, “incompetent" and thus are doomed from the get go. On the other hand, although not invariably the case, embryos that do make it to the blastocyst stage are much more likely to be euploid and thus “competent.” In fact, even in young women, at least 50% of blastocysts are aneuploid and thus “incompetent.” This percentage increases progressively with advancing age. While age is the main determinant of what percentage of eggs are aneuploid, the protocol used for ovarian stimulation as well as the timing of the hCG “trigger” can also influence the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities. When the hCG trigger is administered too early or too late, the egg might not be developmentally positioned to undergo orderly meiosis and either 1) be unable to expel half its chromosomes as a PB-1 and thus remain an M-I egg, or 2) the PB-1 may be expelled, but could contain an irregular number of chromosomes. In the latter case, the egg would have a visible PB-1 and would thus be labeled as a “mature” (MII) egg, though it would be aneuploid and “incompetent.” The terms “immature” and “post-mature” as applied to eggs , are often interpreted as meaning that the eggs were either harvested (retrieved) too early or too late, and that performing the egg retrieval a day or two earlier or later would have prevented this from happening. This infers that an MI egg was harvested before it was developmentally ready to enter meiosis and that egg post-maturity results from waiting too long before the hCG trigger. This inference is completely erroneous. In fact, an M1 egg could just as easily have resulted from delaying the hCG trigger shot, as it could from administering it too early. Likewise a “postmature” egg can result just as readily from administering hCG too early as too late. For these reasons, the terms “immature” and “post-mature,” as applied to eggs, should be supplanted by the term "dysmature" which simply means that the M-1 or M-2 egg in question is maldeveloped, aneuploid and “incompetent”.
Posts
