It is mainly the chromosomal integrity of the egg, rather than the sperm that determines whether the embryo will be “competent” (i.e. have the potential to develop into a normal baby). It is the age of the woman that most profoundly impacts the likelihood that the mature egg will have a full contingent of chromosomes (a “euploid” egg), necessary to achieve embryo “competency.” By way of example, up until about 35 years of age, fewer than 50% of a woman’s mature eggs will be euploid, and thus upon fertilization, more than half will have an irregular chromosome component (i.e. “aneuploid”) and thus be “incompetent.”
Incompetent embryos either will fail to develop normally, fail to attach (implant) in the uterine lining, miscarry, or even result in a chromosomally abnormal baby (e.g. Down syndrome). As a woman ages beyond her mid-30’s the incidence of egg/embryo aneuploidy increases such that by the time she reaches her mid forties, more than 90% of her eggs/embryos will be aneuploid and incompetent.
To make matters worse, the older the woman, the closer she gets to the time that her ovaries run out of eggs and she stops ovulating and menstruating (i.e. menopause). The 6-8 years prior to menopause (i.e. the climacteric or pre-menopause) which is characterized by 1) diminishing ovarian reserve (DOR) with an associated progressive reduction in the number of available number of mature eggs at the time of egg retrieval, and 2) building resistance to fertility drugs.
To complicate matters further, it becomes ever more difficult in the face of DOR, to protect developing eggs during stimulation with fertility drugs in the hope of minimizing the incidence of egg/embryo aneuploidy. This is why, unless a very customized and individualized approach to ovarian stimulation is used in older women and those with DOR, the incidence of egg/embryo aneuploidy may even approach 100%. It also serves to explain why IVF success rates plummet with diminishing ovarian reserve and with advancing age, and why the relentlessly ticking biological clock often creates in them a profound sense of urgency and even desperation to have a baby before their time runs out.
Confronted with the reality that advancing age and diminishing ovarian reserve will inevitably reduce the likelihood of an IVF pregnancy, as well as increasing the risk of miscarriage, in all probability, come at considerable emotional and financial cost, many such women often choose to undergo IVF using the eggs derived from a younger egg donor.
Embryo banking offers many older women an those with DOR a realistic and cost-efficient alternative to IVF with Egg Donation: The recent introduction of Embryo Banking at SIRM now offers an alternative to egg donation for many older women, as well as those with prematurely diminishing ovarian reserve (DOR) who otherwise would have a very small chance of having a baby with their own eggs. This is provided, of course, that they still have an ability to produce some ovarian follicles in response to fertility drugs.
Embryo banking involves a process whereby several blastocysts are accumulated (stockpiled) over two or more IVF cycles. After each such cycle, the embryos are biopsied for CGH analysis, taken to the blastocyst stage of development and then vitrified (ultra-rapidly frozen and banked). All biopsy specimens accumulated over several such cycles are held for as long as it takes to complete the scheduled IVF egg retrieval cycles, whereupon they are collectively dispatched for a single CGH analysis (to reduce testing costs). When the results return, the “incompetent” (CGH-abnormal) embryos are discarded while the “competent” ones are stored (cryobanked) for a subsequent embryo transfer. With this method, the transfer of even a single “competent” embryo is capable of achieving almost a 70% chance of a viable pregnancy, regardless of the age of the woman.

So, how often do you find in older women that they are capable of producing a single "competent" embryo? Are there a number of cases where women can produce a reasonable amount of follicles, but find few to no chromosomally normal eggs?
ReplyDeleteI ask because I just went through this process (and I am 33). 2 IVF cycles to to retrieval. No fresh transfers. The retrieved a total of 22 eggs in 2 cycles. From those, I ended up with 5 Day 5 blasts, only 2 of which had progressed far enough for PGD. Which was cancelled because there were only 2 available for biopsy. My first transfer just failed, well, technically it ended in a chemical pregnancy with the highest HCG measured at 12.5 and I am proceeding into my next and final transfer. I've had an RPL workup so I know that I am fine - no translocations, uterus in good shape, etc.
So, I am trying to figure out how much of an anomaly I am or if this could be somewhat common. Your post made me think perhaps I am more of an anomaly than I had considered because your success percentages seem much higher than what I am experiencing.
Dr. Sher,
ReplyDeleteI'm unfortunately turning 45 years old next month. I recently started a new job that provides me with insurance that once again has IVF coverage. I'm willing to take my chances and try my 3 attempts even at this age regardless of the % of success. Sadly, it is not up to me anymore. Even my RE has to have a poll done at the clinic to see if they’ll even let me.
I've done 4 IVF's starting at age 42 and my last at 43. The second to last attempt resulted in a viable pregnancy which did end in miscarriage at 7 weeks.
I'm not opposed to donor eggs, in fact I would be calling Shady Grove tomorrow if I had the funds for it, but like many of us 'older' women out there, we can't afford to do it.
My mother and her mother had children late in life and these were back in the 20's & 60's at ages 40 and 44. Menopause in my family of women has the dependency to occur in the mid 50's. (My Mother being 54, both my older sisters being 55 at the time they reach menopause)
I guess I'm hoping for the best and praying that my RE gives me another go at it even though statistically my odds are against me. I had to have my Day 3 blood work done to see how everything was doing and everything came back in normal range and my FSH was 7. They also had me do the AMH test and that came back as fair, but as I’ve been reading, many clinics do not believe in this test. So I’m not banking my odds on it.
I empathize with you. However, although it is likely that your failed cycles were all due to age-related egg/embryo quality issues, I would strongly recommend that you not discount the possibility of an implantation dysfunction because if that exists, even donor egg-IVF will likely not succeed either. Go to the articles posted on May 10th and May 16th 20111...elsewhere on this site.
ReplyDeleteGood luck!
Geoff Sher
At your age.....it is very unlikely that you have an intractable egg/embryo issue. It is very possible that you were either unlucky or you need a different more individualized protocol for ovarian stimulation. Might I recommend that you go to the home page on this site , there you will find a "search bar" in the upper right hand column. Type in the following subjects into the bar and it will take you to all the relevant articles I posted there.
ReplyDelete1. "An Individualized Approach to Ovarian stimulation" Posted on November 22nd, 2010
2. “Agonist/Antagonist Conversion Protocol”
3. "Immunologic Implantation Dysfunction" (posted on May, 10th and on May 16th respectively.
4. “IVF success: Factors that influence outcome.
5. “Embryo Banking”
When you have read these (and any others that might interest you)please consider calling 800-780-7437 or 702-699-7437 to set up a telephone consultation (which is free for those living in the U.S.A or Canada) with me so we might discuss your case in detail.
Geoff Sher
Hello Dr Geoffrey,
ReplyDeleteI am 42. My Day 3 blood work results are: FSH:7, AMH: .54ng/ml and Estradiol 36.2 pg/ml.
Would I be a good candidate for IVF / Embryo Bnaking? please advise. Thank you.
PV
You would be an excellent candidate! If you wish, call 800-780-=7437 so we can di9scuss.
ReplyDeleteGeoff Sher