Friday, November 13, 2009

Ureaplasma Infection: Its Effect on Fertility and IVF Outcome

Ureaplasma urealyticum is a bacteria that belongs to the mycoplasma family. It can be detected in the reproductive tract of as many as 40% of individuals (male and female). Ureaplasma probably does not prevent normal conception in the majority of cases, because the uterine cavity remains sterile even in women whose cervical mucous cultures positive for the organism. However, when present in the woman's cervical secretions, the organism can be unintentionally dragged into the uterine cavity through introduction of a catheter into the uterus at the time of embryo transfer (ET) or intrauterine insemination (IUI). Molecular biologists have shown that contamination of rapidly growing cell cultures, by this organism and its close “relative", mycoplasma hominis rapidly destroys such cells. The implanting embryo is indeed an example of an organism that comprises rapidly growing cells in a biological culture medium (the uterine lining), and as such, the cells of the trophoblast that form the "root system” of the embryo are vulnerable to intrauterine infection with Ureaplasma. However, even if the uterine cavity were to become infected, the infection willl be purged with the shedding of the infected lining at the time of the next menstruation.

While infection with Ureaplasma rarely produces symptoms in the woman, it sometimes causes symptomatic prostatitis or epydidimitis in men. Although ureaplasma can be transmitted from one partner to the other by sexual intercourse, it may also be acquired by other means, since a large percentage of couples in monogamous relationships will culture positive for the organism. It is very difficult for the organism to grow in the laboratory. Accordingly, the reproductive secretions of both partners should be evaluated (sperm and cervical mucus) individually. Successful culturing of ureaplasma requires a specialized media in which the specimens can be transported safely from the physician’s office to the microbiology laboratory.

If both partners culture negative, we can assume that there is no infection present. However, if one partner cultures positive and the other negative, we would err on the side of caution, by assuming that the negative result was caused by the difficulty in culturing the organism. When ureaplasma is detected in the reproductive secretions of either partner, both should be treated concurrently with the appropriate antibiotic (doxycycline, zithromax, erythromycin, ciprofloxin, or metranidazole).

Unfortunately, in approximately 30-40% of couples infected ureaplasma urealyticum, the bacteria will have built resistance to mainstay traditional antibiotics such as tetracyclines (e.g. doxycycline) and erythromycin (e.g. Zythromax) derivatives. In such cases, ciprofloxin or metronidazole (Flagyl) therapy might be needed. This is the reason that we prefer to document cure by reculturing each partner prior to beginning ovarian stimulation for an IVF cycle.

Several authors have shown a difference in pregnancy rates among patients with ureaplasma infection who were treated with antibiotics and those who were not. Other reports have not been able to identify an effect on outcome from ureaplasma infection. Thus, until the final verdict is in regarding the roll of ureaplasma with regard to its effect on IVF implantation, we prefer to err on the side of caution and ensure that this organism is absent in cervical secretions and semen before transferring embryos. To this end, my patients all receive prophylactic antibiotic therapy around the time of embryo transfer. This is administered as oral ciprofloxin. A day or two prior to embryo transfer, vaginal cleomycin suppositories are added.

6 comments:

  1. Dear Dr. Sher, This was posted under Lupron and IVF so you probably didn't see it. So here it is again my question about Lupron. Thank you very much for answering.


    Dear Dr. Sher,

    Hope all is well. We had a consultation previously and I was looking to cycle possibly in December. Sorry I don't have any way to ask this privately. My husband and I would like to have a consultation on one of those Fridays but the office said you only were available next Monday and Tuesday and would be away for 2 1/2 weeks.

    So we will go ahead and ask our question here. Is there an alternative to Lupron? After Channel 13's very negative report on Lupron recently, it became a worry. So we would like to know if there is any suggestion to replace Lupron during the IVF treatment.

    Thanks,
    Nancy

    November 7, 2009 11:02 AM
    ReplyDelete
  2. There is (nafarelin, Synarel, Busereline, etc. However they all work in a similar manner with similar effects. You can avoid an "agoist altogether ,,but there is a bigger price to pay if you do! I have been prescribing Lupron for >20 years and in my opinion in spite of "some bad press", it is one of the safest drugs around. Also, remember, much of the reports stem from long term use (as with endometriosis)where Lupron is taken for protracted periods of time. When you do this, the prlonged ovarian (estrogen) suppression can have risks. However, with ART you use it fore a few days only....no real problems at all.It is like anything else...a matter iof how you use it.

    Please read my article on Lupron, elsewhere in this blog.

    By the way,have you ever read the insert in in an aspirin package? You might become even more alarmed.

    Geoff Sher
    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Dr. Sher,

    Thank you for the great answer. We are very relieved! An early Happy Thanksgiving to you.

    Nancy :-)
    ReplyDelete
  4. We lost our daughter due to ureaplasma probably, or incompetent cervix at 21 wks 3 days. We got pregnant through iui/clomid. I do have PCOS but all blood levels are normal, just polycystic ovaries. We got treated with doxycycline and tried again 3 months after our loss and had a chemical, bit that's still a positive! Since then my body stopped responding to clomid then we we did femera and stopped responding, so on to follistem we went had a good cycle but bfn and then had a bad cycle estrogen dropped early and eggs were only 18 and 17 and bfn, then cycle the best we had but bfn:-( so my question is my IF doctor never retested me for ureaplasma and I am asking what should we do now, be retested for urealplasma move onto maybe mini ivf or ivf??? Any thoughts?? I am 21 and hubby 26 his sperm is fine:-) please help!
    ReplyDelete
  5. Possibly…but I doubt it.

    Geoff Sher
    ReplyDelete