Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Lupron Therapy and IVF

All gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists act by rapidly expunging reservoirs of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) from the pituitary gland. GnRH agonists can be administered by intramuscular injection (e.g. Lupron, Buserelin) or through intranasal administration (Nafarelin, Synarel). The intramuscular route which insures more even absorption is preferred.

At SIRM we prescribe leuprolide acetate (Lupron) to launch most IVF controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) cycles. Lupron is very similar in structure to GnRH. As such, its initial effect (for about 2-4 days or so) is to stimulate the pituitary gland to produce both LH and FSH. As soon as the pituitary starts to recognize the difference in chemical structure between the Leuprolide and normal GnRH, it profoundly reduces its output of biologically active LH and FSH production. This is referred to as “pituitary down-regulation” and the effect continues for as long as Lupron therapy is maintained uninterrupted. The initial increase in FSH and LH production during the first 4-6 days of leuprolide therapy is accompanied by a transient, but very significant increase in estrogen release by the ovary. The initial rise in LH and FSH production results in a rise in estradiol, and the subsequent pituitary “down-regulation” is followed by a precipitous fall in blood estrogen levels, until gonadotropin or estrogen administration commences.

The reason that agonists are administered to women receiving Gonadotropin therapy for IVF is because of its ability to suppress LH and so prevent a premature rise in LH which is most likely to occur in older women or those with have diminished ovarian reserve. When this happens the cells lining the follicles undergo premature change (premature luteinization), compromising further follicle development and egg/embryo quality. Such premature luteinization (previously referred to as “premature LH surge”) severely compromises further follicle development as well as egg/embryo quality. Women with reduced ovarian reserve (who are resistant to ovarian stimulation) are most susceptible to this happening.

There is often talk of agonists “over-suppressing” ovarian response to gonadotropins. The reason for this concern is that agonists probably compete with FSH for receptor binding sites on the granulosa cells that line the ovarian follicles and produce estrogen…and so can blunt ovarian follicle response to FSH. However, since antagonists apparently do not exert the same effect, by supplanting Lupron with an antagonist prior to starting gonadotropin therapy, avoids this problem (see the agonist/antagonist conversion protocol -A/ACP below). While both antagonists and agonists block LH activity, antagonists do so much more rapidly (within hours) than agonists (within a few days).

Use of Lupron to Launch COH for IVF
At SIRM we launch COH for IVF by putting the woman on a birth control pill (BCP) for 10-25 days, to suppress ovarian response to FSH/LH. Thereupon, Lupron is overlapped with the BCP for 2-4 days. Then the BCP is discontinued and daily Lupron therapy is continued until menstruation ensues. By varying the length of time on Lupron it is possible to control the timing of the onset of menstruation and reduce the incidence of cycle cancellation due to ovarian cyst formation. Menstruation will usually occur 4-7 days after stopping the BCP. Thereupon, one of two variations in approach is taken. Either the long Lupron approach or the agonist/antagonist conversion protocol (A/ACP) is used. With the A/ACP, Lupron is supplanted by low dosage antagonist therapy. In both cases, daily Gonadotropin (FSH and LH) injections are concomitantly initiated and continued with the agonist or antagonist until the day of the hCG trigger.

In some cases of markedly diminished ovarian reserve, we preempt the initiation of gonadotropin therapy with “estrogen priming”. It involves twice weekly injections of estradiol valerate for 8-10 days and then we initiate Gonadotropin therapy which is continued until more than 50% of the developing follicles reach at least 12mm in diameter. The addition of estrogen in this way is believed to improve ovarian response to gonadotropins as well as endometrial response to estrogen stimulation. In both the long Lupron approach and the A/ACP, daily shots of antagonist or antagonist are continued up to the day of the hCG trigger. The egg retrieval (ER) is performed 35-37 hours following hCG administration.

Lupron Use in Embryo Recipient Cycles
Cases of egg donation, embryo donation, gestational surrogacy, and frozen/thawed embryo transfers (FET) undergo a similar regime of BCP/agonist preparation as do those who undergo ovarian stimulation, except that instead of receiving gonadotropin injections, these women receive daily estradiol valerate injections. Thereupon, progesterone therapy (administered by intramuscular injection and/or by vaginal administration) is added for several days. The combination of estrogen and progesterone therapy prepares the uterine lining for embryo implantation. Lupron therapy is discontinued 5-7 days prior to Embryo Transfer (ET) in such cases.

There is really no need to be overwhelmed by what at first might seem to be a complex treatment regimen. Extensive studies on non-human primates, as well as limited human evaluations, indicate that Lupron is relatively harmless to both mother and baby. The drug is eliminated from the system within hours of discontinuing its administration. At SIRM we discontinue Lupron therapy at least 5-7 days prior to transferring embryos/blastocysts to the woman's uterus. The administration of subcutaneous or trans-nasal agonist is rarely associated with significant side effects. Some women experience temporary fluctuations in mood, hot flashes, nausea, and symptoms not similar to PMS. No serious long-lasting side-effects have been reported.

The subcutaneous injection of Lupron is relatively painless. Unfortunately, the drug will incur a modest additional financial burden. Lupron administration as described above spares women the inconvenience and frustration of unnecessary cancelled treatment cycles with gonadotropins. As such, the use of Lupron in reality reduces the overall cost of ovulation induction.

14 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Dr. Sher,

    Hope all is well. We had a consultation previously and I was looking to cycle possibly in December. Sorry I don't have any way to ask this privately. My husband and I would like to have a consultation on one of those Fridays but the office said you only were available next Monday and Tuesday and would be away for 2 1/2 weeks.

    So we will go ahead and ask our question here. Is there an alternative to Lupron? After Channel 13's very negative report on Lupron recently, it became a worry. So we would like to know if there is any suggestion to replace Lupron during the IVF treatment.

    Thanks,
    Nancy
    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Dr. Sher,

    I'm getting ready to start an IVF cycle and have been diagnosed with DOR (FSH after CCT of 12.5, I think). I had a miracle baby with a single IUI after taking the lowest dose of Clomid 1.5 years ago.

    I'm wondering whether I'm on the right protocol (estrogen priming / antagonist). Do you think I would produce more and/or better quality eggs if I was using the microdose lupron protocol?

    I haven't been able to find much difference in outcomes on PubMed, but it would be great to get a clinician's opinion. I will be 38 in Feb.

    Thanks so much,
    Hopeful Mom
    ReplyDelete
  5. Please read ny articlwes elsewhere on this blog regarding "Diminished Ovarian Reserve...". The last thing you need is a microdose flare protocol. The suggested protocol is a better one.

    good luck!

    Geoff Sher
    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you!!! You have really put my mind at ease.

    Warmest wishes,
    Hopeful Mom
    ReplyDelete
  7. Ok. Read the posts. It sounds like you'd recommend an agonist/antagonist conversion protocol instead? Not sure I understand it completely, but it sounds like the key part is remaining on a low dose of antagonist during stimulation??? And you wouldn't stimulate with menopur at all?

    As it stands, I'll be on estrogen and progesterone for ~2 weeks, then ganirelix for a week, followed by follistim and menopur and potentially more ganirelix (is this considered late antagonist?) before triggering with ovidrel. Does this sound ok? I'm not sure if my LH was high or not, and I did respond well to clomid, so maybe my DOR isn't super severe yet?

    I want to understand as much as I can before going through this process, but it is a lot to learn in a short amount of time.

    What do you think about DHEA supplementation, by the way? Dangerous because it could lead to too much testosterone? There seem to be some promising papers on it in the literature...

    Thanks again!
    Hopeful Mom
    ReplyDelete
  8. I do not recommend DHEA as it is an androgen and metabolizes to testosterone. Too much ovarian testosterione is not good for the eggs.

    Ovidrel is not my fovourite either...UNLESS a double dosage is given. In the single dose I believe it to be less biologically active than 10,000U of hCG

    In many cases, especially older women and/or women who have diminished ovarian reserve, Menopur and Repronex in large doses deliver more LH and thus LH-induced testosterone than is good for normal follicle growth and egg development.

    In my opinion, 2 weeks of progesterone followed by a week of antagonist is too long. It is likely to suppress the final 5 day process of egg recruitment which is driven by the rising FSH level that occurs spontaneously preceding the initiation of menstruation. Since such prolonged premenstrual administration of progesterone/ganirelix will suppress FSH it could result it taking much longer than necessary to stimulate you.

    Please read the article elsewhere in this blog entitled; "An Individualized Aproach to Ovarian Stimulation".

    Good luck!

    Geoff Sher
    ReplyDelete
  9. If using Lupron as a trigger, is it injected intramuscularly?
    ReplyDelete
  10. Hmmm...what would you do instead of menopur? Just use a higher dose of follistim? (I may be getting a little out of my league here.)

    My doctor does retrievals/implantations during the same week for all of her patients, so maybe that's why the long progesterone/ganirelix portion - to get me on their schedule...?

    Even if it takes a long time to stimulate me, will the results (i.e., egg number/quality) be similar to a shorter stimulation period?

    Thanks for wishing me luck - seems like I'm going to need it! :)

    Thanks again,
    H.M.

    P.S. Couldn't find the exact title you mention in your blog, but I ran across this elsewhere on the web - is it similar to what you wanted me to read?

    http://forums.haveababy.com/lofiversion/index.php?t865.html
    ReplyDelete
  11. It is basically the same.

    I cannot represent that using P4/Ganirelix premenstrually will yield the same results as an an "agonist) premenstrually would do. It might be OK but I am not sure.

    Yes! you can simply increase the dose of Folistim.

    Good luck!

    Geoff Sher
    ReplyDelete
  12. Dear Dr. Sher,

    How to determine BCP and Lupron are needed in a cycle?
    The reason I asked this is because I was told by a nurse from Gonal-F that I was over-suppressed and that's why I even didn't respond to 575 unit gonal-F which was considered high dose based on her opinion and my age (37).
    Also, my best friend was on a protocol without BCP and micro-dose lupron. She is pregant. We are at same age. Both of us are poor responders. both of us never take BCP until do IVF. Both of us have FSH around 7-9.
    Now, my doctor is put me on lupron + Cetrotide then + gonal-F 750, why?

    Thanks,

    Rebecca
    ReplyDelete
  13. Please read my article elsewhere on theis blog on use of the BCP in IVF.

    Geoff Sher
    ReplyDelete