Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Ovarian Reserve: An Overview (A Guest Post by Drew Tortoriello, MD)

It is my pleasure to introduce Drew Tortoriello, MD as a guest writer on my blog today. Dr. Tortoriello is the Medical Director of SIRM-New York and a close friend and colleague. He is an outstanding physician and is well qualified to address the topic of Ovarian Reserve.

- Geoff Sher
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Concept of Ovarian Reserve
In order to adequately counsel women experiencing infertility about their prognosis, as well as to determine which treatment might serve them best, reproductive endocrinologists routinely perform some screening tests to assess their patients’ ovarian reserve. What is ovarian reserve? It is basically an estimate of how many oocytes (eggs) are left in the ovaries, and that often translates into how many eggs we are going to be able to work with over the course of any given monthly treatment.

The ovary, as miraculous a structure as it is, is unfortunately very wasteful. Every month it calls forth from within itself a troop of immature eggs, only one of which is destined to ovulate. Depending on how vast your ovarian reserve is, that starting “troop” can range from one or two, to sixty or seventy. The one egg that’s “chosen” to ovulate resides within an ever-enlarging ovarian follicle or cyst that is readily visible on ultrasound by mid-cycle. Ultimately when that dominant follicle gets big enough, say about 2 centimeters, it will rupture or ovulate. When all is perfect, the mature egg will then get picked up by the nearby fallopian tube, be fertilized by sperm, and make its way into the uterine cavity where it will burrow in and make a baby. All the other eggs that were recruited will die, a process called atresia. That’s why women are essentially devoid of eggs by age 50 despite only ovulating about 400 eggs over the course of their lifetimes.

Ovarian Reserve Testing
Ovarian reserve can to a very general extent be predicted by age; i.e. a woman in her forties will have very diminished ovarian reserve while a woman in her twenties should have excellent ovarian reserve. However, there is such a tremendous amount of individual variation that physicians and researchers sought other factors to help elucidate ovarian reserve better. Several hormones with predictive power have since been described and are now an almost indispensable part of fertility assessment.

In addition to a depletion in egg number, there is a decrease in egg quality with time, and this is the major factor limiting success in older women. Egg quality refers in general to chromosomal normalcy, and age predicts relative egg quality better than ovarian reserve screening. Therefore, a younger woman with poor ovarian reserve testing will still have a better chance at getting pregnant than an older woman with the exact same results. Age is an independent predictor of IVF outcome and is more closely related to implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates than the hormonal reserve markers.

The hormone most often used to gauge ovarian reserve is the day 2 or 3 FSH level. Think of FSH as the wake-up call for the ovary; if the ovary is responsive then the amount of FSH needed to get the ovary up and running is minimal (a good scenario). If the ovary is non-responsive (i.e. few developing follicles with a commensurately low level of estradiol and inhibin being made), then the pituitary gland tries to compensate for this by pumping out a large amount of FSH (a bad scenario). When the ovary completely runs out of eggs in menopause, the amount of FSH in the bloodstream is very elevated to the point where it can be over ten times that of a woman in her twenties.

FSH is also an independent predictor of IVF outcome, correlating mainly with the number of retrieved oocytes. Recent studies have shown that young women with high FSH levels demonstrate lower numbers of growing follicles but can still achieve good pregnancy rates if oocytes and embryos are obtained. This highlights the premise that age reflects egg quality better than FSH levels do.

Estradiol is usually measured simultaneously with basal FSH. Even if the basal FSH is normal, estradiol elevations greater than 70 pg/mL are also associated with poor response to ovarian stimulation. Elevated early follicular phase estradiol levels may indicate an inappropriately advanced stage of follicular development, a sign of ovarian aging whose clinical manifestation is a shorter menstrual cycle. This situation can also occur if the patient has misjudged her cycle timing or has an estrogen secreting (“functional”) ovarian cyst.

A recent addition to the list of promising candidates for predicting ovarian response is anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), also known as mullerian inhibiting substance (MIS). MIS is produced in the ovary by granulosa cells of growing preantral and small antral follicles. MIS concentrations correlate well with antral follicle count and age and at the present moment seems to constitute the most sensitive marker of ovarian aging. Indeed, it has been shown that poor response in IVF is associated with decreased MIS levels. An added benefit of MIS assessment is that it does not fluctuate over the course of any given menstrual cycle so it can be drawn at any point irrespective of cycle timing.

The antral follicle count or AFC is the number of antral follicles (small egg-containing ovarian cysts) visible by transvaginal ultrasound in the early follicular phase of the cycle. The AFC decreases with age and provides perhaps the best single prognostic indicator for poor response during IVF. A normal AFC for a woman in her twenties to thirties is somewhere in the range of 12 to 16. Women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) often have AFCs greater than 50, and it is therefore not surprising that when challenged with gonadotropin medication their response in terms of egg number can be astronomical.

Several “challenge” tests have been designed that offer the theoretical benefit of measuring ovarian reserve in a dynamic, and perhaps more clinically representative way. The clomiphene citrate challenge test (CCCT) is the most commonly used of these and involves the administration of 100 mg clomiphene citrate on days 5 to 9, and the measurement of FSH levels on days 3 and 10. An abnormal test is defined as an abnormally high FSH on day 10. With basal FSH and the CCCT, a normal result is of little predictive value, but an abnormal result is predictive of poor outcome from infertility treatment. Given that the CCCT offers no clear advantage over and above a single basal FSH measurement, a basal FSH measurement seems adequate.

When all is said and done, the best estimate of ovarian reserve is derived from actually treating a patient and observing her relative responsiveness to the medication administered. It therefore pays to monitor each patient very carefully over the first several days of treatment so medication can be adjusted accordingly.

13 comments:

Sharon said...

Thanks for posting this - could you comment on low AMH, PCOS and response to oral meds like clomid or femara? I was diagnosed with PCOS 2.5 years ago, conceived twins on our first clomid cycle last September (but lost them in the second trimester) and have been unable to conceive since the miscarriage. I respond to both femara and clomid (50 mg) with 1-2 follicles. This last month out of the blue, I ovulated early on my own and an AMH test came back at 0.6. I though AMH for PCOS patients was supposed to be high? All of a sudden I am facing DOR in the span of a few months. Is this possible or likely? What is my prognosis give my response to clomid/femara?

Geoffrey Sher, MD said...

Dr. Tortoriello responds:

Diminished ovarian reserve is a possibility; not even PCOS patients maintain their high output forever. However, no one indicator of ovarian reserve is perfect; it is better to get a few tests done to get a more comprehensive overview. Regarding your AMH level, it does appear to be low for a woman with presumed PCOS, but the value is not consistent with poor ovarian reserve by most facilities standards. Also, the specific AMH assay used by different facilities can differ and one lab's 0.6 can be higher in another lab. It is important for your facility to compare their AMH values to patient outcome so they can counsel you appropriately. If your doctor scans your ovaries and they still have many small antral follicles (at least 7 per ovary), then your ovarian reserve should not be a big issue.

- Dr. Tortoriello

Brigette said...

I was diagnosed with DOR at age 32. I am now about to turn 35. I have had 3 unsuccessful IVF's in upstate NY. I had a positive pregnancy test on my second but my levels were low. My most recent cycle only yielded one embryo. I am debating on whether I should move forward with another IVF. I know my FSH is high but I have not received any other testing that you refer to in your article. Would SIRM consider me as a patient? Also, does SIRM use a woman's endometrial lining to develop a culture for the embryos and if so, does this add any benefit for women with DOR?

Geoffrey Sher, MD said...

Of course we would be willing to accept you. Remember, it is NOT the ovarian reserve (as indicated by FSH,AMH,inhibin B etc) that determines egg quality.It is age and the protocol used for ovarian stimulation that determines egg quality. The eggs of women with DOR require a much more individualized protocol of stimulation.

Please read other blogs on this site regarding factors that affect egg/embryo quality.

Also feel free to call 800-780-7437 for a free medical telephone consultation with me to discuss, if you wish.

Good luck!

Geoff Sher

Brigette said...

Thank you for your kind and prompt response. I didn't know this. I will call.

Brigette

Tala said...

Dr. Sher,
I was diagnosed withe endometriosis two years ago at the age of 29. I'm 31 now with 6 unsuccessful IVF trials. My body only responds to Pureagon, producing 1 to 2 follicles i have a high Fsh level, and was wondering if this a case you would take on?

Geoffrey Sher, MD said...

Please contact us for a free telephone consultation (see the invite at the top of the page).

Geoff Sher

Auntie K said...

Hi Dr. Sher,
I just turned 28 years old and was told I have high fsh (tested only once which came back at 27) I also had my AMH tested and that came back extremely low. I wasn't given the exact number, but for some reason .1 is ringing a bell. Am I out of hope? What would you recommend? Thankfully my husband has good count, motility, etc.

Geoffrey Sher, MD said...

Given your nyouing age and the fact that it is age and NOT%b vFSH that affects egg/embryo quality, you could well have a chance still. BUT time is the issue. I suggest you call 800-780-7437 without delay and set up a phone consultation with me. It is gratis.

Happy Holidays.

Geoff Sher

Mou said...

Hi Dr,

My age is 27. Recently diagnosed with Complex OV Cysts on both ovaries. I have hair growth on my breast and cheek. period irregular. sometime miss it. gained bodyweight approx 82Kg. Do i have any hope of getting pregnant? please advise.

N said...

I just found this post and am wondering what a "normal" AFC would be for a 38 1/2 year old. I have 8-10 on my left. (Right ovary can not be found using ultrasound and is thought to be "out of eggs" or hiding)

Geoffrey Sher, MD said...

Hi Mou,

Of course it is possible. It all depends on the cause of the hormonal imbalance.

Geoff Sher

Geoffrey Sher, MD said...

Hi N,

Given the number of antral follicles on your one side...it is likely that the other side is equally productive and that all is normal in your case.

Post a Comment